Monday, November 2, 2009

Draft 2- of assignment #3

Diego Rivera Pan American Unity Mural

Diego Rivera was a womanizer, revolutionist and honored the working class. He was born in Mexico but studied in Europe where he became renowned for his paintings. He was then invited to join the “Art In Action Program” hosted by the 1940 season of the Golden Gate International Exposition on Treasure Island in San Francisco by Timothy Pflueger, who was a well- known architect. Timothy wanted Diego’s mural to be incorporated in the San Francisco Junior College Library; however, construction of the library was halted due to United States entry into World War II and Pflueger’s unexpected death. During this time Diego was part of the Mexican Muralist Movement and the Pan American Unity mural was the perfect opportunity to intertwine social realism and ancestral art. Currently this mural is housed at the Diego Rivera Theater at City College of San Francisco.

The “Pan American Unity” is a fresco mural representing all of America—North America versus South America. The murals colors are all earthy tones. Diego makes his own paint through traditional natural pigments. Diego painted the South using more vibrant and traditional Latin colors creating a warmth feel. The North is painted with an industrial look and cold feeling. Diego painted the Golden Gate Bridge in the top right corner signifying a bridge between two cultures (North and South), possibly San Francisco a neutral meeting place. The mural is constructed in five panels that went from left to right.

I felt the most powerful panel is the middle panel or panel number three. On the left side of the central figure is the Aztec goddess Coatlicue. She is the goddess of life, death and earth. For the Aztecs she was “Lady of the Serpent Skirt,” goddess of all life, gods as well as humans, animate as well as inanimate (Rivera, 151). Coatlicue has her right hand fully extended in the air with four jade calluses representing wealth. Coatlicue believes when you work with the soil or earth you are wealthy she also depicts the South. The other half of this central figure is a auto plant-stamping machine, which most likely belongs to the Ford Motors Company. This unifying image represents the union of the North and South America, machine and plastic arts. At the bottom of the panel Frida Kahlo his wife and Mexican artist has a paint brush and palette in hand ready to work on a new portrait maybe depicting her passion for of the plastic arts. Behind Frida is Diego with Charlie Chaplin’s wife, Paulette Goddard planting the “tree of life” showing the closeness of Pan Americanism. Possibly even depicting his love affair with Paulette behind Frida’s back or Diego getting even with Frida for her affair with Trotsky. Above them is a wooden carving of a ram, which is the San Francisco City College’s mascot. On the bottom right corner of the panel Diego painted Timothy Pflueger. Timothy has his blue prints of the San Francisco City College Library in hand that was never built due to his sudden death.

The first panel’s theme “The Creative Genius of the South Growing form Religious Fervor and the Native Talent for Plastic Expression”. This panel shows the beginning of Mexico City and how it was derived with the high mountains and volcanoes. Quetzalcoatl a high priest is in the upper left hand corner teaching the Indians. The Indians are utilizing the earth by making their own gold jewelry, sculpting, carving, and painting. There is a portrait of Nezahualcoyotl, the king of Texcoco, bottom left hand corner; it looks like he is trying to make wings to fly. There is a deer dancer at the top right corner of the panel. A feather serpent is coming out of their hut and crossing the land. The serpent’s head, which is made of stone, lands into panel two. The cross reference to this Panel is Panel five, “ The Creative Culture of the North Developing from the Necessity of Making Life Possible in a New and empty Land” it appears the top part of this panel is displaying the gold mining era. There are oil wells, a guy farming for new crop and the bottom half of this panel is Henry Ford and bottom left hand corner, Thomas Edison inventing the light bulb, Robert Fulton engineer of the first successful steamboat and an artist painting a wooden cigar Indian. This panel definitely represents ideology development in the north and the utilization of mother earth for natural resources.

Panel two begins the incorporation of the “Past and Present” which is cross referenced with panel four “Trends of Creative Effort in the United States, The Rise of Woman in Various Fields of Creative Endeavor Through her Use of the Power of Manmade Machinery”. At the top of Panel two it has Helen Crlenkovich a national diving champion doing a back flip in air above the bay bridge possibly during the worldfair with spectators watching her, while artisans are sculpting the serpent head. Marking what was happening at that present moment. While at the bottom of panel represents the past, in the background is the Liberty Tree and in front are the founders of independence that represents both north and South America, fighting for equality and against slavery at that same time period. At the bottom left corner of panel is the back of Diego painting a fresco mural and behind him are the local artisans creating their artwork. At the top of Panel four is a picture of Alcatraz Island and Treasure Island. Diego paints Emmy Lou Packard, his assistant and next to her is Frank Lloyd Wright, a famous architect and a little girl. There is a wooden sculptor carving a figurehead that looks like it would be made for a ship. There is a woman doing a back flip above everyone while a couple female fellow swimmers are watching and next to them is a women in a suit with blue prints possibly an architect. This upper panel definitely acknowledges the rise of women. The bottom half of this panel has the image of Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini all leaders in dictatorship. Charlie Chaplin is below them who created the film “ The Great Dictator” at the time of World War II. I believe this was symbolic in representing two different styles of leadership: totalitarian dictatorship that was occurring in Europe versus the belief system of liberty in America.

Diego had a conversation with Dorothy Puccinelli in reference to his main purpose for this mural which is stated as follows “I believe in order to make an American art, a real American art, (it) will be necessary (to have) this blending of the art of the Indian, the Mexican, the Eskimo, with the kind of urge which makes the machine, the invention in the material side of life, which is also the artistic urge—the same urge primarily but in a different form of expression.” Hence, I believe Diego did convey his message on the Pan American Unity Mural, in which he paid homage to both the ancestral side and machine side and all the working class people. Diego illustrated this by comparing the times in his mural North versus South America. The unification of the ancestral side and machine side are both forms of art and progression that represent “All of America”.

13 comments:

  1. You said that you do not think you did a good job however I beg to differ. Your work is great! Don't doubt yourself :) Your organization, transitioning, and grammar look great to me. Great conclusions too! I like how you wrapped everything up at the end of each paragraph reminding me of the purpose of your paper.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The paper was pretty well written with only a few minor grammar errors such as wording of sentences. I did want to know if the assignment called for you to discuss the Mexican Mural Movement in greater detail because if you did you may be able to better explain the symbols and characters Diego paints instead of simply telling us what you see. The description you give us is very clear in detail which helps us the reader to visualize the mural even if we have not seen it. I thought overall you paper was well written and you had a clear structure that made it easy to follow and read. My only suggestion to you is to explain the movement so that people will understand the meaning behind the work. This will help those who have not studied art understand with the extra information.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You definitely have all of the facts here, which im assuming is a good thing because you are supposed to be acting as a critic, and also you do a good job of describing what you saw and what it resembles. I think the grammar could use a little revising, and also some of the paragraph strustures. I like how you incorporated what part of the mural affected you the most, it's always good to tie yourself into papers like these to give them some life!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I feel like you have many good facts in this paper but coming from someone who hasnt seen the artwork it feels like you are just listing a bunch of facts directly explaining everything in the artwork. As a reader i care mor about how you interpret the things you see rather than just listing off every single thing thats going on in the picture. maybe you could cut out some of those facts and add more analysis so that it is easier for the reader to get into and analyze the art with you rather than just try to map out the picture in my head as i read because i cannot remember that many different things without actually seeing the painting.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The paper's thesis seems a tad unclear, I'm assuming the idea was to describe and explain the visual and symbolic elements of the mural? Some things I noticed...in the 2nd paragraph you say verses which implies to me a sense of oppostion,unless that sense was the intention I'd try evoke more of a sense of contrast or comparing than fighting. It's unclear if he always made his own paints for all his works or if that was a unique aspect of the mural or even just that panel. warmth sounds funny to me, not sure. in the 3rd paragraph the 6th sentence is unclear. I'm curious what "plastic arts" are. In the 4th paragraph derived with sounds strange mabey try derived from instead. Overall an interesting read, the conclusion seems strong, and the organizing by themes keeps the reader focused, though because the panels are listed as numbers and titles it can seem a bit jumpy at times.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Yvonne!

    Your essay was good just sort of off. It seems that that prompt was asking you for analysis. You do more describing in the essay. You describe in detail what the mural looks like and who the figures are but you do not discuss the bigger picture. What is your analysis of the mural and why murals are different?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Your discriptions are very good and help form images of what is happening in the painting, but What do you think? You never really express what the art ment to you. I would think that is part of being a art critic; giving your critic. The quote is also very nice, but I feel like if it was used earlier then it would give more information about the artisit before you expericnce the art. The north verses south is a little unclear until your last paragraph, but the quote explains it a little clearer.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I like your description of the overall mural and it really describes the entire atmosphere around the painting and also provides some history into the creation of it. One of the suggestions I would give is that you talk about all of these various historical figures and artifacts from around the world that are represented in the painting but somehow lost me somewhere in the middle of your essay. It would work out really well if you could go back and organize your descriptions and discussions of the different things in the mural from where they are located on it. Other than that, good luck on your paper.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hi Yvonne,

    Interesting topic, and I can see where you find difficulty in writing your paper. There is a lot of good detail in your paper.

    I have never seen the mural before, and while you did put a lot of good detail about the art inside, I found it difficult to visualize what exactly the mural looked like because of the order in which you described the panels. You started with three, went to one and five, and then two and four, so I feel like I was only able to visualize in pieces rather than as a whole.

    The thesis seems to be in the conclusion of the paper where you write about what Diego's purpose was with the mural, and how you feel as though he portrayed. Without knowing the assignment myself, it seems as though the meanings and the symbols get lost in the descriptions you portray.

    I would also have a difficult time writing this type of paper, so I commend you for what you've done so far! It definitely comes alive more as you give us what some of these representations are. Keep it up!

    ReplyDelete
  10. This paper is very good. It describes the mural well and creates a picture for someone who has never looked on it before. You did a great job of including information about Diego's past and about the history of some of the other parts and people in the mural. I think it would be easier to offer a way to improve it if I knew the assignment and of course the teacher grading it. I do suggest that you include more details about your thoughts and feelings about the mural. Maybe if it stirred some emotions in you or reminded you of a certain scene or experience in your life. However, I'm not sure if that kind of information is relevant to the assignment, but it would certainly make the paper more intriguing and would be a good way to show more personality in your paper. Also I would include more evidence to back up your claims like "I believe this was symbolic in representing two different styles of leadership: totalitarian dictatorship that was occurring in Europe versus the belief system of liberty in America." I want to know more about why you think this to understand it better. Overall this paper is really great and it makes me want to go see this work of art, it sounds very beautiful and complex.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Nice work Yvonne, you must have meticulously studied this mural because you mention every detail that keeps the reader informed. I read the assignment and it seems like you followed the guidelines and answered most of the questions quite well. The thesis could be clearer to keep the paper right on track and conclusion could be improved a little to tie in all that was said above.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The essay is good. It conveys what you see in the mural well. You shown how he is a womanizer and where is shows up in this work. You show how he honors the working class by painting them in there noble endeavors, one remark I have is about making an observation about how the working class is how above the leaders of industry. His revolutionary ideal is really talked about much in the essay. Looking at the mural you did a good job of capturing it.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I really enjoyed your paper, it is heading into a great place. I clearly understand your purpose and goal in writing this.

    I am wondering one thing. While you are writing about a mural that shows South-North American unity, you hint at possible conflicts between cultures. For example in the second paragraph you are talking about the use of color. In your line "Diego painted the South using more vibrant and traditional Latin colors creating a warmth feel. The North is painted with an industrial look and cold feeling." I would be interested in hearing more about why the traditional is posed as bright and warm, humble and inviting, while the north with industrial capitalism is posed as cold, perhaps alienating. (sorry, I know im not supposed to comment on content, but your paper is fascinating to me. If I am wrong in my assumptions please disregard).


    If you did in fact find that Diego was bringing to light some conflict, as a reader I would be interested in reading more about that.

    ReplyDelete